A study on the evolution of indigenous species in the aiims ecosystem

Please note that this study is based on observations made before june-2010

The taxonomy and nomenclature of Facchus aiimsonicus has always been a topic of much dispute. Most puritanical biologists believe that on the basis of morphology and phylogeny it is not a separate species per se but is in fact a sibling species of the Homo sapiens while the modernists claim that brain-mapping and behaviour psychology establish beyond doubt its status as a separate entity. After the ground-breaking observations by the noted phylogenists Kullz et al that over the course of a definite period of time fixed by them as “2 semesters” a process of what they describe as “resolution of first year syndrome and epic-disillusionment” most of the members of this species undergo a radical transformation and acquire the characteristics of their sibling species,the Homo sapiens. Also Darwin’s law remains valid and natural selection does eventually play itself out in this remarkable process but in a neverbefore seen manner . The ones who have certain mutations in the gene ‘Intel2p6’ -which regulates the translation of a transmembrane protein called intelligentsia expressed on the surface of CNS cells –do not undergo the resolution process and instead transform to a separate species called Facchus persisticus ludicrous.This new species retains the morphology of its parent species but shares none of its higher mental functions and capabilities.Surprisingly natural selction here gives rise to atavistic characters instead of the more advanced ones and this species most closely resembles Gorilla gorilla gorilla.

This strange finding has been explained by eminent biologists Singh and Dudeja et al with their theory “survival of the most popular”,according to which if a sufficiently large number of individuals having marked phenotypic differences congregate in a relatively small ecosystem,by virtue of their mutual understanding and behavioural patterns they alter their surroundings and influence the selection process to such an extent that they themselves are ultimately selected.A vicious loop is then setup as the remaining members of the ecosystem then are forced to either to alter their spatial and temporal distribution to avoid conflicts arising due to sharing of resources or exhibit mimicry of their characteristics.This has led to incalculable loss of bio-diversity and as of present there’s anarchy and pandemonium in the aiims ecosystem.

Agnihotri et al have in their extraordinary longitudinal study discovered a symbiosis between certain members of the Facchus species and Fachhus aiimsonicus persisticus(please note that there is much debate as to why are they still considered facchus despite them being well out of their first year of inhabitation in the ecosystem) .They found that whenever some of the non-ludicrous individuals come across a herd of ludicrous animals,before they can be attacked or chased by them,these individuals start stimulating the anal orifices of the ludicrous herd members and in doing so avoid prosecution.This anulingus of sorts has over time proved to be an evolutionary advantage and as an adaptive change their tongues have hypertrophied to a ridiculous extent.This sort of behaviour has now become a part of their natural predisposition and it is postulated that these individuals would over time form a bridging link between the two species. Given the eclectic and unstable genetic makeup of most of the members of the ludicrous species,it is not surprising that there is a high mutation rate among them and thus no generalised inferences can be derived for this group.This is undoubtedly a hotbed of evolutionary process and a wetdream of most anthropologists.